In the last post I mentioned the December article in Nature that compared the science articles in Wikipedia and Encyclopedia Britannica. Britannica issued a response to which Nature has in turn posted its own response. (The link for the Britannica rebuttal is only to a partial quoting of their document - the link to the actual .pdf seems to be having problems...)
Quite a bit of uproar, and interesting the way it highlights changing intellectual publishing and activity.
No comments:
Post a Comment